With this prior criminal history how much time is "he" looking at? _"Best Answer" on AVVO.com ~ Call Michael A. Haber, Esq. @ 1-888-SHARK-8-1
Q: Ok I'm going to try to sum it up as briefly as i can... He went to prison for two years for 1 vop for depositing with intent to defraud, 5 vops for grand theft motor vehicle, 2 vops for uttering a forged instrument, 1 vop for possession of controlled substance, and 1 vop for grand theft third degree, plus new charges of 1 obtaining food lodge with intent to defraud, 1 uttering a forged instrument, 1 grand theft third degree, 21 worthless check charges, 1 organized fraud, 2 obtaining property for worthless check charges and 1 counterfeit payment charge. He did his time and got out July 1st 2014. He then was arrested again Jan 2015, less than 7 months from being released and got charged a possession of parapherenalia and or use, a possession of meth ( he had 2 grams on him according to police report) and a driving while license is suspended or revoked habitual. He also has had several other charges previously over the years since 2006. He seems to be on cloud nine and thinks he walks on water and that hes going to walk with probation. I'm not judge or lawyer but that is just crazy to me if he does, there doesn't seem to be any possible way he isn't going to do more time. What could he be looking at?
Answered . My money is on "Him" going away for a loooooooooooong time.
With that criminal history / record any prosecutor worth their weight in dog cr*p will do her/his best to enhance "Him" (perhaps as a PERP - a prison release offender) and otherwise to have "Him" launched to the moon; and if "He" is found guilty then any Judge with an ounce of sense will almost certainly decide that "He" has absolutely no regard for either the law or the rules of society and will, in fact, likely launch "Him" to the moon.
That said "He" may enjoy defenses to his charges, affirmative or otherwise, or there may be a factual, legal, procedural or substantive mechanism which "His" lawyer can use to beat "His" case.
Still, the fact remains that "He" is looking at the statutory maximum, whatever that may factor out to be, and if "He" is found guilty then "He" will probably (almost certainly based upon your proffer) get each and every minute of it.
I hope that I've been helpful in answering your question.
First, second and third: No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of any Q&A with Michael A. Haber, Esq. on Avvo. Fourth: Anything that you post on Avvo (or on similar sites) or on any social media is by its nature public. It is essentially an admission / confession and can be introduced into evidence as a statement against your interest in a subsequent legal proceeding. Once posted you lose any reasonable expectation of privacy, so, as this is an open forum (with no privilege attached), please be extra careful when considering what to post online (forewarned is forearmed.)
Since 1991 Michael A. Haber, P.A. has an unblemished record of providing boutique criminal defense litigation services to many folks who have been accused of criminality.
Michael A. Haber, Esq. has creatively, effectively and zealously represented clients on a wide variety of criminal matters ranging from DUI to drug trafficking and from misdemeanors to first degree murder.
Michael A. Haber, Esq. is prepared to speak with you about your case! At Michael A. Haber, P.A. "its all about reasonable doubt"!
THIS BLOG POST (AS ARE ALL OF HABERPA BLOG POSTS) IS A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT WHICH IS PRIMARILY DESIGNED, BY WAY OF REAL WORLD EXAMPLE, TO ASSIST THE GENERAL PUBLIC IN AVOIDING CONDUCT WHICH COULD FORESEEABLY RESULT IN ARREST AND PROSECUTION!
No comments:
Post a Comment