PLEASE WATCH #HABERPA'S VIDEOFAQ 402) Why do we have a 6th Amendment Right to Counsel? - https://youtu.be/wOv8zsU_hZg
This Blog Post is intended to serve three purposes: First and foremost it's a PSA (i.e. a "Public Service Announcement" that's designed to provide the folks with important information), it's part of the rollout of the latest batch of #HaberPA's VideoFAQs highlighting # 402) Why do we have a 6th Amendment Right to Counsel? - https://youtu.be/wOv8zsU_hZg and it's a shameless plug for #MichaelHaberLaw (#HaberPA's YouTube channel). Disclosures complete let's get to it:
- The PSA: #HaberPA's VideoFAQ # 402 explains the genesis of our 6th Amendment "Right to Counsel".
Because I’m a history geek I’m especially grateful for the opportunity to explain your 6th Amendment Right to Counsel.
Before we won our independence from the British Crown, the US was nothing more than a series of colonies, populated by folks who traversed the Atlantic Ocean, many fleeing King George III’s tyrannical rule, yet finding themselves still subject to the imperiousness of a Monarch. After a bloody, prolonged war 'OLE UNCLE SAM WAS BORN, our freedom was won, we secured our independence and via the U.S. Constitution we established a protocol for how our new Kingless Country would be governed.
As a shout out to Massachusetts, our Founding Fathers and Founding Mothers were WICKED SMART. They drew up our Constitution with foresight and benevolence; but, they didn't get it absolutely correct in it's first draft, so modifications were required. In fact, due to a few omissions several colonies opposed ratifying the Constitution and only agreed to endorse because additions - or amendments - were agreed to in advance. Those “conditions precedent” are the first 10 Amendments - which are collectively known as “The Bill of Rights”, which obviously include The 6th, and which were added to the US Constitution on December 15, 1791.
That observed, United States law stemmed from British “Common Law”, and when the USA became sentient, British Common Law still required all criminally accused persons to self-represent (as an aside that changed in the UK in 1836 when full legal representation was authorized in British Courts). If my math is correct then our forefathers were 45 years ahead of their British brethren in conferring a constitutional right to counsel whenever one is accused of committing a crime by the government.
Even before our Revolutionary War - prior to “The Shot heard around the world” at Lexington / Concord - John Adams famously represented the 8 British Soldiers who were charged in The Boston Massacre, because a then 35-year-old Adams believed it vital that those soldiers receive a “fair trial”, although he also believed that the colonial cause for self-government would be damaged if “Boston justice” turned out to be little more than “Lynch Law”, and he was also convinced that the soldiers were wrongly accused as they fired in self-defense.
With all of that said I thank you for your question and I appreciate your having asked it. Please remember that at #HaberPA it’s all about reasonable doubt and if you like this video then please subscribe to our YouTube channel / VideoFAQ as we’ll be putting out more soon!
- The shameless plug: #HaberPA's VideoFAQ catalogue is now up to 419 Criminal Defense, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Constitutional Law, DUI, BUI, Domestic Violence, Evidence, Crime Victim Rights, Seal & Expunge and now includes Lawyer Ethics "Webisodes".
If you've not yet done so then I hope that you'll please SUBSCRIBE to #HaberPA's YouTube Channel #MichaelHaberLaw by visiting the following link: www.youtube.com/c/michaelhaberlaw
As of today we have 2,839 subscribers who've contributed to our 759,528 views, but your kind subscription will get us closer to reaching our immediate goal of 3,000 subscribers and 1,000,000 views!
Each #HaberPA VideoFAQ focuses on a specific question, most are 1 - 2 minutes long, but several in this latest batch are closer to the 3 minute mark (another relevant aside alert: "Necessity" is what we call an "Affirmative Defense", or a defense which negates the "intent" or Mens Rea" element of an otherwise criminal act as the actor's illegal conduct only occurred under threat, usually threat of harm), and while we may not always be successful in our endeavor we do consistently strive to make each VideoFAQ short, pointed, creative, entertaining and, most importantly, informative.
While I conjure some of the "questions" that form our VideoFAQs a substantial portion of them are in fact inspired by real world questions from others (e.g. clients, potential clients, random folks on social media / the internet, friends, family, colleagues, etcetera). Should you have a legal questions that you'd like #HaberPA to address then you're welcome - encouraged even - to SUBMIT it / them to me, be it by email (Sharky910@aol.com), calling or texting my cell phone (305-798-2220), messaging me on X /Twitter, MeWe or Truth Social (@Sharky910), on YouTube (via MichaelHaberLaw) or PM'ing me on FB (Miami.Criminal.Lawyer) and, assuming that your proposed topic is both appropriate and fits within our wheelhouse then I'll be happy to provide you with a custom tailored video answer to your relevant question.
With all that said I hope that you enjoy # 402, that if you've not yet done so then that you become a #MichaelHaberLaw subscriber and in any event that you know that no Attorney-Client Relationship with either #HaberPA or Michael A. Haber, Esq. exists as a result of watching any of our VideoFAQs. All information contained in and which may be construed from any #HaberPA VideoFAQ is meant to be generic in nature, should only be considered as academic and is not "Legal Advise" for any specific person or case. That said if you're looking for Legal Advise then please contact #HaberPA directly and schedule a confidential consultation.
Should you, a friend, a loved one or even someone that you {don't particularly like but happen to} know be in a jam with the Criminal Justice System then you can rest assured that either retaining or recommending #HaberPA will not only reflect well on you but will provide the client with unwavering, relentless and honest advocacy.
Established in 1991 and with no history whatsoever of any form of professional discipline, #HaberPA is readily available to have open, honest dialogue with potential clients and to quote and honor reasonable fees after identifying a realistic litigation objective. We're proud of our unblemished and time proven record of both having our client's "6:00", 24-7-365, 360° and of providing boutique, creative, effective, unwavering and zealous #CriminalDefense, #CriminalLaw, #CriminalProcedure, #ConstitutionalLaw, #Evidence, #DUI, #BUI, #DomesticViolence, #Probation, #Crime #CrimeVictimRights and #Seal & #Expunge representation to it's clientele, primarily in South Florida, on matters ranging from DUI to #DrugTrafficking and from #Misdemeanors to #Murder.
At #HaberPA "it's all about #ReasonableDoubt"!
YT: MichaelHaberLaw
FB: Miami.Criminal.Lawyer
X / MeWe / Truth Social: Sharky910
WWW: CriminalLaw.miami
E-Mail: Sharky910@aol.com
Office: 1-888-SHARK-8-1
Cell: 305-798-2220
https://www.youtube.com/c/michaelhaberlaw / @Sharky910
No comments:
Post a Comment