This Blog Post is a PSA (i.e. a "Public Service Announcement" that's designed to provide the folks with important information) but it also both marks the rollout of this latest batch of #HaberPA's VideoFAQs and highlights # 398) "What is “Contempt of Cop”?" and finally it's a shameless plug for #MichaelHaberLaw (#HaberPA's YouTube channel). Disclosures complete let's get to it:
- The PSA: #HaberPA's VideoFAQ # 398 explains the concept of “Contempt of Cop”? and goes like this:
"Thanks for asking me “What is “Contempt of Cop”?”
Per Wiki (which has as fine a definition as you'll find anywhere): "Contempt of Cop" is law enforcement jargon in the United States for behavior by people toward police that they - the cops - perceive as being either disrespectful or insufficiently deferential to their authority. It’is a play on the phrase "Contempt of Court", and it’s not an actual offense. The phrase is associated with unlawful arbitrary arrest and detention of individuals, often for expressing or exercising rights guaranteed to them by the Constitution. "Contempt of Cop" is often discussed in connection with police misconduct, such as excessive use of force or police brutality as a reaction to perceived disrespectful behavior rather than for any legitimate law enforcement purpose."
"Contempt of Cop" is a form of “occupational arrogance" - it occurs where a Police Officer believes - be it actual or perceived - that her / his authority either can not or should not be challenged or questioned. From such an Officers' perspective, this can involve both verbal and physical challenges to authority, and ranges from disobeying instructions to insisting that a cop is violating your rights to threatening to file a complaint to fleeing to taking a swing and so on.
While neither legal nor acceptable, Contempt of Cop is both a very real and a reasonably foreseeable possibility where one - again, be it either in reality or simply as perceived - challenges, demeans, insults or humiliates a Police Officer. So, if you either refuse or fail to follow instructions to the Cop’s satisfaction (be those instructions lawful, rational reasonable or not), if you’re willfully defiant or uncooperative, if you’re disrespectful or profane, if you levy a challenge to an officer’s authority - be it by telling Officer Unfriendly that you "know the law" or simply by proclaiming your "rights - if you engage in obstructive behavior (be it passive resistance to either being handcuffed or being redirected into a squad car, actually battering or striking a cop, fleeing on foot or in a vehicle, whatever...) in all these situations you’re likely to be held in “contempt of cop”.
Apart from picking-up “gratuitous charges” like Resisting Arrest, Obstruction of Justice or worse, “contempt of cop” can result in the use of excessive force, ranging from a baton beat-down, getting tasered, or a shellacking by a gaggle of Gendarmerie."
- The roll-out: Over the course of Memorial Day weekend we published #HaberPA VideoFAQs # 376 - 401, 5 of which deal with The Fourth Amendment per se, another 5 of which deal directly with the subject of warrants, 4 of which deal with searches and Motions to Suppress, 3 of which deal with Miranda Rights, 1 on "Spoliation of Evidence", 1 on "Chain of Custody" and 6 that deal with Arrests (more specifically 2 of which are generic, 2 concerning "Contempt of Cop" and 2 on "Gratuitous Charges").
Again, today we are highlighting # 398) "What is “Contempt of Cop”?", which you can watch at the following URL: https://youtu.be/rDLmQVqjLvg
- The shameless plug: #HaberPA's VideoFAQ catalogue is now up to 401 Criminal Defense, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, DUI, BUI, Domestic Violence, Evidence, Crime Victim Rights and Seal & Expunge "Webisodes" and we are currently scripting 24 new ones concerning such topics as: The 6th Amendment, Public Defenders vs. Private Criminal Defense Counsel, lawyer ethics (insert snarky oxymoron joke here...) and client's rights as are imposed upon all lawyers in The Sunshine State via the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar and updated firearm / gun laws in Florida's new Constitutional Carry era.
If you've not yet done so then I hope that you'll please SUBSCRIBE to #HaberPA's YouTube Channel #MichaelHaberLaw by visiting the following link: www.youtube.com/c/michaelhaberlaw
As of today we have 2,495 subscribers who've contributed to our 698,585 views, but your kind subscription will get us closer to reaching our immediate goal of 3,000 subscribers and 1,000,000 views!
Each #HaberPA VideoFAQ focuses on a specific question, most are 1 - 2 minutes long, but several in this latest batch are closer to the 3 minute mark (another relevant aside alert: "Necessity" is what we call an "affirmative defense", or a defense which negates the "intent" or Mens Rea" element of an otherwise criminal act as the actor's illegal conduct only occurred under threat, usually threat of harm), and while we may not always be successful in our endeavor we do consistently strive to make each VideoFAQ short, pointed, creative, entertaining and, most importantly, informative.
While I admittedly conjure a healthy percentage of the "questions" that form our VideoFAQs a substantial portion of them are in fact inspired by real world questions from others (e.g. clients, potential clients, random folks on social media / the internet, friends, family, colleagues, etcetera). Should you have a legal questions that you'd like #HaberPA to address then you're welcome - encouraged even - to SUBMIT it / them to me, be it by email (Sharky910@aol.com), calling or texting my cell phone (305-798-2220), messaging me on X /Twitter (@Sharky910), MeWe (also @Sharky910), on YouTube (via MichaelHaberLaw) or by PM'ing me right here on FB and, assuming that your proposed topic is both appropriate and fits within our wheelhouse then we'll be happy to provide you with a custom tailored video answer to your relevant question.
With all that said I hope that you enjoy # 398, that if you've not yet done so then that you become a #MichaelHaberLaw subscriber and in any event that you know that no attorney-client relationship with either #HaberPA or Michael A. Haber, Esq. exists as a result of watching any of our VideoFAQs. Any and all information which is both contained in and may be construed from our VideoFAQ is meant to be generic in nature, should only be considered as academic and is not intended to be construed as legal advise to any specific individual for any specific case. Should you wish to seek actual legal advise then please feel free to contact #HaberPA directly.
Should you, a friend, a loved one or even someone that you {don't particularly like but happen to} know be in a jam with the criminal justice system then you can rest assured that either retaining or recommending #HaberPA will not only reflect well on you but will provide the client with unwavering, relentless and honest advocacy.
Established in 1991 and with no history whatsoever of any form of professional discipline, #HaberPA is readily available to have open, honest dialogue with potential clients and to quote and honor reasonable fees after identifying a realistic litigation objective. We're proud of our unblemished and time proven record of both having our client's "6:00", 24-7-365, 360° and of providing boutique, creative, effective, unwavering and zealous #CriminalDefense, #CriminalLaw, #CriminalProcedure, #ConstitutionalLaw, #Evidence, #DUI, #BUI, #DomesticViolence, #Probation, #Crime #VictimRights and #Seal & #Expunge representation to it's clientele, primarily in South Florida, on matters ranging from DUI to #DrugTrafficking and from #Misdemeanors to #Murder.
At #HaberPA "it's all about #ReasonableDoubt"!
YT: www.youtube.com/c/MichaelHaberLaw
FB: www.facebook.com/Miami.Criminal.Lawyer
X: www.twitter.com/Sharky910
WWW: www.criminallaw.miami
E-Mail: Sharky910@aol.com
Cell: 305-798-2220
Office: 305-381-8686
Toll Free: 1-888-SHARK-8-1
https://www.youtube.com/c/michaelhaberlaw / @Sharky910 /
No comments:
Post a Comment